Legal Opinion

State v. . Crowder

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1887PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Indictment for removing a crop, tried before Clark, Judge,. and a jury, at January Term, 1887, of Anson Superior Court. There was a verdict of guilty, and the defendant appealed.. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMerrimon, J.

The statute, {The Code, §1759,) in respect-to “landlord and tenant,” provides that, “Any lessee or cropper, or the assigns of either, or any other person, who shall remove said crop, or any part thereof from such land,, without the consent of the lessor or his assigns, and without-giving him or his agent five days’ notice of such intended removal, and before satisfying all the liens held by the lessor or his assigns on said crop, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor; and if any landlord shall unlawfully, wilfully, knowingly, and without process of law, and unjustly, seize the crop of his tenant,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. . WilbourneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. State v. ConnorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. State v. . ConnorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API