Legal Opinion

Taisho Marine & Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. v. M/v Sea-Land Endurance Sea-Land Service, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 27, 1987No. 86-5747PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:

OVERVIEW

Taisho Marine and Fire Insurance Company (Taisho) appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of Sea-Land Service Incorporated (Sea-Land). The court held that the peril of the sea defense under the Carriage of Goods by the Sea Act (COGSA), 46 U.S.C. app. § 1304(2)(c) (Supp. Ill 1985), prevented Taisho from recovering payments made to a shipper for cargo lost by Sea-Land. Taisho contends that the district court (1) reached a conclusion of law not supported by the facts, (2) improperly considered Taisho’s status as an insurer, and (3) incorrectly placed the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Vana Trading Co. v. S.S. METTE SKOUCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Ore Steamship Corporation v. D/SA/S HasselCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  4. J. Gerber & Co. v. S.S. Sabine HowaldtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  5. Philippine Sugar Centrals Agency v. Kokusai Kisen Kabushiki KaishaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Farrell Lines Inc. v. Columbus Cello-Poly Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. Ferrara v. A. & v. Fishing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. Malkandi v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Washington Mutual, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Damodar Bulk Carriers, Ltd. v. Damodar TanabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API