Legal Opinion

Deitsch v. Wiggins

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 18, 1873PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

82 U.S. 539

21 L.Ed. 228

15 Wall. 539

DEITSCH

v.

WIGGINS.

December Term, 1872

ERROR to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Colorado.

The 21st Rule of this court, as amended November 16th, 1872, and made operative from the first of the following January,* prescribes that the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error shall contain:

i. A concise abstract or statement of the case presenting succinctly the questions involved, and the manner in which they are raised.

ii. An assignment of the errors relied on, which in cases brought up by writ of error, shall set out separately and specifically each error…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Strong.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Deitsch v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American International Pictures, Inc. v. ForemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Van Gunden v. Virginia Coal & Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1892
  3. Southwestern Virginia Imp. Co. v. FrariCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1893
  4. Lloyd v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
  5. McCraw v. WelchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API