Deitsch v. Wiggins
Supreme Court of the United States
Error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Colorado. The 21st Rule of this court; as amended November 16th, 1872, and made operative from the first of the following January,* prescribes that the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error shall contain: i. A concise abstract or statement of the case presenting succinctly the questions involved, and the manner in which they are raised. ii.
Read the full summary
Error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Colorado. The 21st Rule of this court; as amended November 16th, 1872, and made operative from the first of the following January,* prescribes that the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error shall contain: i. A concise abstract or statement of the case presenting succinctly the questions involved, and the manner in which they are raised. ii. An assignment of the errors relied on, which in cases brought up by writ of error, shall set out separately and specifically each error asserted and intended to be urged. The same rule, as…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Strong
Most of the assignments of error have been made in total disregard of the twenty-first rule of this court. That rule is necessary to “the disposition of the business which presses upon us, and it is our intention hereafter to enforce strict compliance with its demands. If errors are not assigned in the manner required, the assignments will be treated as if not made at all, and we feel justified in passing without notice the greater number of those which are alleged to appear in this record. There are, however, some of the assignments which, though not made in full conformity with the rule, we…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Deitsch v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1873