Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Wilson v. Preston

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1962No. (No. 37285Published

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The issues in this cause are whether the summary-judgment procedure is applicable to an action in mandamus and if so whether the writ of mandamus should be allowed.

Relator filed a motion for a summary judgment in this action, pursuant to Section 2311.041, Revised Code. This raises for the first time in this court the question of whether a motion for summary judgment under our summary-judgment procedure is proper in an action in mandamus.

The pertinent parts of Section 2311.041, Revised Code, read:

“Summary judgment may be granted in a civil action as provided in this section.
“(A) A party…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. American Life & Accident Ins. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State Ex Rel. Curran v. BrookesOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State Ex Rel. Armstrong v. DaveyOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Batcheller v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API