State ex rel. Wilson v. Preston
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The issues in this cause are whether the summary-judgment procedure is applicable to an action in mandamus and if so whether the writ of mandamus should be allowed.
Relator filed a motion for a summary judgment in this action, pursuant to Section 2311.041, Revised Code. This raises for the first time in this court the question of whether a motion for summary judgment under our summary-judgment procedure is proper in an action in mandamus.
The pertinent parts of Section 2311.041, Revised Code, read:
“Summary judgment may be granted in a civil action as provided in this section.
“(A) A party…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- American Life & Accident Ins. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Curran v. BrookesOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- State Ex Rel. Armstrong v. DaveyOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Batcheller v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.