Legal Opinion

Electric Motor & Repair Co. v. Morris & Associates., Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 14, 1968No. 68SC183PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeitt, J.

The waiver of trial by jury invested Judge Hobgood with the dual capacity of judge and juror. Reid v. Johnston, 241 N.C. 201, 85 S.E. 2d 114. Consequently, it was in Judge Hobgood’s province to determine the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be attached to their testimony, and the inferences legitimately to be drawn therefrom, in exactly the same sense that a jury would do in the trial of a case. It was Judge Hobgood’s right and duty to consider and weigh all the competent evidence before him, giving to it such probative value as in his sound discretion and opinion it was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reid v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. Tar River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Turnage Co. v. MortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Main Realty Co. v. Blackstone Valley Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Broyhill Furniture IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. East Coast Development Corp. v. Alderman-250 Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Simon v. MockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Moore v. VolastroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API