Legal Opinion

East Coast Development Corp. v. Alderman-250 Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 15, 1976No. 7615SC61PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Dependant’s Appeal

Defendant contends that since the contract of 23 August 1968 fixed no time for its duration it was subject to termination by either party upon the giving of reasonable notice, and that 60 days notice of termination after the expiration of 4 years and 3 months from the execution of the contract was reasonable.

North Carolina follows the generally accepted view that a contract of indefinite duration may be terminated by either party on giving reasonable notice. See Scarborough v. Adams, 264 N.C. 631, 142 S.E. 2d 608 (1965); Rubber Co. v. Distributors, 253 N.C.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Weyerhaeuser Company v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Cook v. LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. General Tire and Rubber Co. v. Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Fulghum v. Town of SelmaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Smith v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kornegay v. Aspen Asset Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Shugar v. GuillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Parker Marking Systems, Inc. v. Diagraph-Bradley Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Watson Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Price Mechanical, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  5. McCay v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API