Legal Opinion
State v. Rose
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 22, 1956PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
40 N.J. Super. 40 (1956)
122 A.2d 189
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HARRY JOSEPH ROSE, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County Court, Law Division.
Decided March 22, 1956.
Mr. Charles V. Webb, Jr., Prosecutor (Mr. Myron W. Kronisch appearing), attorney for the County of Essex.
Mr. Joseph Butt, attorney for Harry Joseph Rose.
WAUGH, J.C.C.
The petitioner, Harry Joseph Rose, was granted a writ of habeas corpus dated December 20, 1955. In order to acquire an understanding of the present action it is necessary to examine and study other pertinent previous legal proceedings involving this…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- The People v. PopescueIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
- United States Ex Rel. McCann v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- In Re Application of KershnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Worbetz v. GoodmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- State v. WomackNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Jenkins v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- State v. KramerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- State v. RoseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956