Legal Opinion

Elizabeth City v. . Banks

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1909PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The pleadings upon which judgment was rendered disclose this case: On the application of defendant D. B. Banks, the plaintiff, a municipal corporation, duly chartered by the General Assembly of North (409) Carolina, through its mayor and aldermen, on 19 June, 1905, undertook to grant to said Banks, by an ordinance duly passed, on 3 July, 1905, a franchise, extending thirty years, to construct in said town a gas plant for the purpose of furnishing gas, for light, fuel and power to the citizens of Elizabeth City. Said franchise carried the right to use the streets of said city as the said Banks…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Painter v. PainterOhio Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Fawcett v. Town of Mt. AirySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Moose v. . CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Norwich Gas Light Co. v. Norwich City Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  5. White v. Northwestern North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Porsh Builders, Inc. v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Town of Emerald Isle Ex Rel. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. McLean v. KeithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Shaw v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Stillings v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API