Hulen v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GIYAN, Chief Justice.
A jury found appellant, William Terry Hulen, guilty of murdering Robert Quick-ery. Appellant argues the State failed to present evidence sufficient to prove that appellant’s conduct was unlawful. Although appellant’s argument is set forth in one section, it appears that he is making two arguments: First, that the State failed to prove defendant’s conduct was unlawful because it did not present sufficient proof on the absence of heat of passion; and, second, that the State failed to prove that appellant acted “knowingly”. Although appellant intertwines these two theories…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Loyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Bond v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Lock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Sypniewski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Alfaro v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Davenport v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Bryan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Horne v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Whatley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.