Legal Opinion
Bruther v. General Electric Co.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided January 19, 1993No. NA 91-29-CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY
BARKER, District Judge.
Woody Bruther (“Plaintiff’) and Peggy Bruther (collectively “Plaintiffs”) have filed suit against the General Electric Company (“Defendant”) for injuries that Plaintiff sustained from a malfunctioning light bulb that Defendant allegedly manufactured improperly. Defendant moves the Court to enter summary judgment in its favor for two reasons: (1) Plaintiff cannot authenticate the light bulb in question, and (2) Plaintiff cannot establish that the bulb was defective. Defendant also has filed a motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(b) to conduct separate trials on the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edward R. POSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SKYLINE CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Nancy Wolf v. City of Fitchburg and G. Jean SeilingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Alan ShacklefordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Philko Aviation, Inc. v. ShacketSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- John W. WHITTED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, and New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Meadows v. Anchor Longwall and Rebuild, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006