Legal Opinion

Ennis State Bank v. Hubacek

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 5, 1957No. 3518PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALE, Justice.

Appellant will be referred to as the bank, and appellee, a used car dealer, will be referred to as the dealer. The bank brought this action against the dealer to recover the amount of principal, interest and attorney’s fees alleged to be due on five promissory notes which the dealer had sold and endorsed to the bank, and to foreclose chattel mortgage liens securing payment of the notes. The dealer admitted the validity of the bank’s claim, but alleged that he had entered into a prior parol agreement with the bank, whereby the latter was to hold in reserve for the dealer an…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Distributors Investment Co. v. PattonTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Chalk v. DaggettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  3. Robertson v. City National Bank of BowieTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Guarantee Life Ins. Co. v. DavidsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  5. Robert & St. John Motor Co. v. BumpassCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hubacek v. Ennis State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Hubacek v. Ennis State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Ennis State Bank v. HubacekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Hubacek v. Ennis State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API