Legal Opinion

Hubacek v. Ennis State Bank

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1958No. A-6679Published

1Opinion of the Court

317 S.W.2d 30 (1958)

F. A. HUBACEK, Petitioner,

v.

ENNIS STATE BANK, Respondent.

No. A-6679.

Supreme Court of Texas.

October 8, 1958.

Rehearing Denied November 12, 1958.

Griggith & Lumpkins, Waxahachie, for petitioner.

Geo. P. Hines, Ennis, Ralph Hartman, Waxahachie, Looney, Clark & Moorhead, Austin, Mary Joe Carroll, of Looney, Clark & Moorhead, Austin, for respondent.

CALVERT, Justice.

This is a suit by the Ennis State Bank against F. A. Hubacek for the principal, interest, and attorney's fees on five promissory notes and for a foreclosure of chattel mortgages securing same. Three of the notes were…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hubacek v. Ennis State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Thomas v. HammondTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Woods v. TownsendTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Chalk v. DaggettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  5. Guarantee Life Ins. Co. v. DavidsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API