Brannan v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING BY STATE.
HAWKINS, Judge.
The state has filed a motion for rehearing calling attention to a matter not discussed in our original opinion. An argument in behalf of the state was then on file which presents the point now insisted upon, but it was in a separate document from the brief filed by the state and the document containing the argument was overlooked.
The state insists that the application for continuance — the refusal of which was made the basis of complaint — was in fact a second application for continuance and was fatally defective for having omitted therefrom the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coffey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Griffith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Tinker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Jeffers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.