Griffith v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of burglary, his punishment being assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary'.
When the case was called for trial application for continuance was made on account of the absence of the witnesses John Johnson and Chester Smith. The case was postponed several days, and when again called for trial another application was made for continuance. This we believe would be a second application, and it was so treated by the appellant in making the application, and by the court in passing upon it. The application on its face shows that it was…
2Cited by9 opinions
- State v. KellyWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Coffey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- O'Neal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Glass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.