Legal Opinion

Bankers' & Shippers' Ins. v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 1, 1927No. 12151PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Brease.

The firm of Coleman & Moore, owners of a lot of cotton in bales, located on the platform of the defendant’s station in the town of Switzer, insured the cotton against loss by fire with the plaintiff. On November 2, 1922, the cotton was totally destroyed by fire. The plaintiff paid the amount of loss to Coleman & Moore, and, under its right of subrogation, brought suit against the defendant in the Court of Common Pleas for Spartanburg ■ County to recover the amount paid out by it on account of the loss.

In its complaint, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mitchum v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
  2. Brown v. Carolina Midland Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  3. Fleming v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. James Turner & Sons v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Blakely v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  3. Epps v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  4. McLeod v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API