Legal Opinion

Bickhart v. Henry

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1917No. 9,475PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Rush Circuit Court; Clarence E. Weir, Special Judge. Action by Charles S. Henry against Christopher J. Bickhart. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

This action in ejectment was brought by appellee against appellant to recover the possession of certain described real estate situate in the city of Rushville, and damages for its detention. The complaint is in the usual short form. The answer is a general denial. A trial before a special judge resulted in a general finding and judgment in favor of appellee, that he is the owner and that he have possession of the land. Damages were awarded him in the sum of $195.

From a consideration of all the briefs, we are able to determine that the crucial point in the case is the question of the validity…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sherman v. FitchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  2. National State Bank v. Vigo County National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. City of Boston v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Gorder v. Plattsmouth Canning Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Nolen v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. C. Callahan Co. v. Lafayette Consumers Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. United States v. Arnol & Mildred Shafer Farms, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
  3. Arnol & Mildred Shafer Farms, Inc. v. ITT Financial Services-Commercial Division (In Re Arnol & Mildred Shafer Farms, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API