Legal Opinion

Cascade Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 2, 1978No. C.D. 4757; Court No. 75-2-00493PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

This action challenges the basis of appraisement and the appraised values of certain knucHeboom cranes. The cranes are of the 10C, 300, and 50C series with modifications and were manufactured by Toyo Umpanki Co., Ltd. of Japan (hereinafter referred to as “TOM”) under patents held by plaintiff corporation.

Appraisement was made on the basis of constructed value as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165. The appraised values, as agreed upon by the parties, were obtained from the manufacturer’s suggested retail…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wood v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  2. Greb Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. Ellis Silver Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Spanexico, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cascade Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API