Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Harder
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 256, Jan. T., 1904, by plaintiff from order of C. P. Lycoming Co., Sept. T., 1902, No. 327, making absolute rule to open judgment in case of The Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York v. Err H. Harder and Henry J. Shadle. Rule to open judgment. Before Hart, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was order making absolute rule to open judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Elkin,
The appellant is a foreign corporation. It furnishes fidelity bonds for persons employed in positions of responsibility and trust. One of the appellees, Harder, being employed as assistant treasurer of the Williamsport Gas Company, was required to furnish a bond. The appellant became his surety on the bond required by the employing company. The material conditions of said bond so far as the present case is concerned required the appellant to “ make good and reimburse to the employer to the extent of the sum of two thousand dollars, and no further, such pecuniary…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Keough v. LeslieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- Greenawalt v. KohneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
- Shughart v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
- Chalfant v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gandy v. WeckerlySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Potter v. GrimmSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Hein v. FetzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Yinger v. YoungmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Gandy v. WeckerlySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.