Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 20, 1924No. 4309PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

These are petitions to revise certain orders in bankruptcy. Tbe record has not been printed and contains no index. It consists of upwards of 50 elosely typewritten pages, wherein pleadings, orders, explanations, and arguments are indiscriminately commingled. It is needless to say that an appellate court should not be compelled to wade through such a mass for tbe purpose of ascertaining the facts or tbe questions for decision. But, *332waiving all this, the facts gleaned from the record are substantially these:

Early in December, 1920, the bankrupt, through the petitioner, as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. In re Arti-Stain Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re National Public Service CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  2. Kanter v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  3. In Re BarcelouxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  4. In re Savoia Macaroni Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1933
  5. Bensinger v. HillesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API