Legal Opinion
Arnold Lynn v. Dennis Bliden, First Deputy Supt.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 30, 2006No. 04-6280 PRPublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MINER, Circuit Judge.
The question presented here is whether the District Court improperly concluded under AEDPA review that the state court’s application of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), was objectively unreasonable for having rejected a Sixth Amendment challenge based on various alleged failures of trial counsel.
Respondent-appellant First Deputy Superintendent Dennis Bliden (hereinafter the “State”) appeals from a judgment entered September 28, 2004, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Wood, J.) granting…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Murden v. ArtuzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Rosario v. ErcoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Mozell v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- DiMattina v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Ortiz v. N.Y.S. Parole in Bronx, N.Y.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.