Legal Opinion
Murphy v. New York Racing Ass'n
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Arthur W. Lonschein, J.
Petitioner is a farrier, or horseshoer, who has been barred by the respondent New York Racing Association (NYRA) from working on its property. He seeks to compel the respondent to readmit him until a hearing is had before respondent’s "Barn Area Violations Panel”. The respondent argues that it has an unfettered right to bar petitioner with or without a hearing, as it chooses, and that in any event it did give petitioner a full opportunity to be heard.
Farriers are licensed by the State’s Racing and Wagering *736Board (Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barry v. BarchiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jacobson v. New York Racing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Saumell v. New York Racing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Stevens v. New York Racing Ass'n, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- Arone v. Sullivan County Harness Racing Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Galvin v. New York Racing Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Murphy v. New York Racing Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989