Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph M. Margiotta

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 13, 1981No. 266, 267 and 429, Dockets 81-1190, 81-1258 and 81-3073PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:

For more than a century after the founding of the Republic, the permissible scope of government appeals from adverse rulings in criminal cases was not in dispute. Independent of the double jeopardy provision of the Constitution, early common law did not provide a right of appeal for the Government in criminal cases. 1 Beginning in 1907, federal enactments authorized Government appeals in limited circumstances. 2 Despite this, courts generally made clear their disposition to interpret statutory authority strictly against the right to appeal. 3 The subsequent decades-long…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph M. MargiottaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. Outley v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Bernard McKeonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  4. Purgess v. SharrockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Purgess v. SharrockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API