State v. Dowell, Unpublished Decision (4-27-2005)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} James A. Dowell has filed a timely application for reopening pursuant to App.R. 26(B). Dowell is attempting to reopen the appellate judgment that was rendered in State v. Dowell, Cuyahoga App. No. 83575,2004-Ohio-3870, which affirmed his conviction for one count of murder with a firearm specification. Dowell's application for reopening is denied for the following reasons.
{¶ 2} Initially, we find that the doctrine of res judicata prevents the reopening of Dowell's original appeal. Errors of law that were either previously raised or could have been raised through…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. DowellOhio Court of Appeals · 2022