Legal Opinion
Tatro v. University of Minnesota
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 20, 2012No. A10-1440PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
When appellant Amanda Tatro was a junior in the Mortuary Science Program at respondent University of Minnesota, she posted statements on Facebook, a social networking site, which she has described in court filings as “satirical commentary and violent fantasy about her school experience.” After becoming aware of these posts, a faculty member referred the matter to the Office for Student Conduct and Academic Integrity. Following a hearing, the Campus Committee on Student Behavior (CCSB) found that Tatro had violated the Student Conduct Code and academic program rules…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hazelwood School District v. KuhlmeierSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bethel School District No. 403 v. FraserSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Gieseke v. IDCA, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Minnesota Majority v. Joe ManskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Craig Keefe v. Beth AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Mark Oyama v. University of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.