Legal Opinion
Board of Hudson River Regulating District v. Fonda, Johnstown & Gloversville Railroad
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.
Plaintiff is a public corporation created pursuant to section 432 of the Conservation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 65) and is authorized pursuant to section 446 of that statute to acquire real estate by condemnation. It brought this proceeding to acquire title to and possession of certain property of the Fonda, Johnstown and Gloversville Railroad Company in Fulton county. Its stated purpose was the construction of a dam and reservoir for the regulation of the flow of the waters of Sacandaga river which lie within the territory of the Hudson River Regulating District. Commissioners were appointed to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Colorado v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Dayton-Goose Creek Railway Co. v. United States, Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Waldo's, Inc. v. Village of Johnson CityNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Black River Regulating District v. Adirondack League ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. City of MarshfieldDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2000
- City of Buffalo v. DayNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Town of Massena v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., New York County Courts1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.