State v. McCray
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.
Respondent Charles Howard McCray II was charged with first- and second-degree criminal sexual conduct against T.C., the 7-year-old daughter of his girlfriend. But because T.C.’s trial testimony was inconsistent with her pretrial statement regarding penetration, the district court dismissed the first-degree charge. Before closing arguments, the court instructed the jury that the penetration matter had been resolved and that “[njeither the attorneys nor I will address these matters further.” During the State’s closing argument, however, the prosecutor made…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. MayhornSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. CarridineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. NissalkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. PendletonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, Appellant, v. Byron David SMITH, Appellant, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.