Legal Opinion

State v. McCray

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 31, 2008No. A06-857PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.

Respondent Charles Howard McCray II was charged with first- and second-degree criminal sexual conduct against T.C., the 7-year-old daughter of his girlfriend. But because T.C.’s trial testimony was inconsistent with her pretrial statement regarding penetration, the district court dismissed the first-degree charge. Before closing arguments, the court instructed the jury that the penetration matter had been resolved and that “[njeither the attorneys nor I will address these matters further.” During the State’s closing argument, however, the prosecutor made…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. State v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. MayhornSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. CarridineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. State v. NissalkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. State v. PendletonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  4. STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, Appellant, v. Byron David SMITH, Appellant, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  5. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API