Legal Opinion

McNatt v. McRae

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 29, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Roberts. Montgomery superior court. December 13, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtLamar, J.

There was an affray in which both plaintiff and defendant were seriously injured. McRae was cut with a knife, the tendon of his forearm severed, permanently disabling him. McNatt *899was beaten and bruised about the head, and otherwise badly hurt. Each claimed that he had interposed as a peacemaker, and that the other had done him great bodily harm. Each prosecuted the other, but with what result does not appear. Subsequently McRae sued McNatt for the assault and battery, and McNatt filed an answer which was the equivalent of the general issue, besides which he'filed a plea of set-off for the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Morris v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. PritchettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  4. James v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API