Legal Opinion

Brown v. Patterson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 25, 1926No. 7 Div. 568PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The single question presented by the record is: In a civil action of assault and battery, may the defendant plead in recoupment damages for assault and battery committed by the plaintiff at the same time and as a part of the same transaction? Stated differently, if parties fight willingly or under other conditions wherein neither party can justify himself in this form of action, can the one recoup for his injuries when sued by the other; or, if suit be brought against one justified under the law, may he by plea of recoupment'present his cross-action and recover in the one suit?

By the nature…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Holley v. YoungeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  2. Gutzman v. ClancyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Morris v. McClellanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Hatchett v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
  5. Mitchell v. GambillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. A. B. C. Truck Lines, Inc. v. KenemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Scroggins v. Alabama Gas CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. Alabama Power Co. v. KendrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Norton v. BumpusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API