Legal Opinion

Blackwood v. Standridge

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 20, 1924No. 6 Div. 48PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

In this action of deceit by appellee against appellant's, the complaint alleged that in a sale of land between the parties defendants represented to plaintiff that the land was free of all incumbrance, well knowing that such representation was untrue. There was judgment for plaintiff.

The complaint described the land in question as lying in range 1 east, whereas the evidence showed it to be in range 1 west; the reference being to the meridian of Huntsville. This variance can advantage defendants nothing on this appeal because the attention of the trial court was in no 'wise called to it.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tillis v. Smith Sons Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  2. Montgomery Southern Railway Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. Martin v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cartwright v. BralySupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. General Accident, Fire & Life Assur. Corp. v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Johnson v. DaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Phillips v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API