Legal Opinion

Madden v. International Union, United Mine Workers

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 4, 1948No. Civ. A. 2141-48PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDSBOROUGH, Associate Justice. (Orally)

Gentlemen, as you know, there is a motion on the part of the National Labor Relations Board for a mandator}/ injunction requiring the United Mine Workers of America and John L. Lewis their president to bargain collectively with the mine operators.

That motion is based on a law passed in 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. § 141 et seq. The material parts of the law say that “it shall be an unlawful labor practice for a labor organization or its agents to restrain or coerce an employer in selection of his representatives for the purpose of collective bargaining for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Evans v. International Typographical UnionDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1948

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Kentucky Utilities Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
  3. Penello v. International Union, United Mine WorkersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1950
  4. Kentov v. Point Blank Body Armor, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
  5. Wirtz v. Atlantic States Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API