Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Schwartz

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 19, 1990No. 89, September Term, 1989PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

When the Carroll County Board of Zoning Appeals granted a conditional use for a privately owned airport in 1982, it attached to that grant several conditions. One of them limited the frequency of take-offs of glider-towing aircraft; another established a curfew for the operation of those aircraft. Both conditions were designed to reduce the effect of aircraft engine noise on residential properties near the airport. Both are invalid. They trespass upon a field that has been impliedly preempted by federal law. City of Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc., 411 U.S. 624, 93 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. City of Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gustafson v. City of Lake AngelusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Montgomery County v. REVERE NATIONAL CORP., INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Cae-Link Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. In re Request for Jurisdictional Opinion re: Changes in Physical Structure and Use at Burlington International Airport for F-35ASupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  5. Wells v. Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API