Legal Opinion

Oppenheim v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 9847Published

From the Cass Circuit Court.

1Opinion

On Petition eob, a Reheabing.

Elliott, J.

The appellee insists that no question is presented upon the motion for a new trial for the reason that no exception was taken to the finding of the court upon the agreed state of facts. The whole argument upon this point proceeds on the assumption that an agreed case is the same thing as a case wherein there is an agreement as to what facts shall be taken as the evidence in the case. Section 386 of the code refers to agreed cases, and has no application to cases where there is an agreement as to the facts. The cases holding that an exception to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Martin v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Feaster v. WoodfillIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Case v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Creighton v. PiperIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Fisher v. PurdueIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API