Legal Opinion

Davis v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided March 2, 1993No. 1868-91-4PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BARROW, J.

In this criminal appeal, we consider the meaning of

the phrase “temporarily unoccupied” contained in Code § 18.2-77 (arson). We hold that a dwelling referred to in that section as “temporarily unoccupied” is one that is currently uninhabited, not one from which its occupants are merely absent at the time it is burned. Thus, when the defendant burned the house in which he and others lived, he was guilty of a Class 2 felony, rather than a Class 3 felony, even though no one was in the house at the time. See Code § 18.2-77.1

The defendant and two sub-tenants, a woman and her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Campbell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  2. State v. GreenOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. KingsburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. State v. ScarberryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. GulleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marable v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  2. Glenn Everette Small v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API