Legal Opinion
BROMLEY v. JERSEY UROLOGY GROUP, P.A.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 13, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00325Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE : BROOKE BROMLEY, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil No. 21-00325 (RBK/MJS) : v. : OPINION : JERSEY UROLOGY GROUP, et al., : : Defendants. : : KUGLER, United States District Judge: This matter comes before the Court upon (1) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5) and (2) Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand and for Sanctions (Doc. 11). For the reasons expressed below, the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT, and the Motion to Remand and for Sanctions is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND This action arises out of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Charles E. Abels and Irene C. Abels v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.