Legal Opinion

Seattle Police Officers Guild v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2004No. 73202-7PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.

In Seattle Police Officers Guild v. City of Seattle, 113 Wn. App. 431, 439, 53 P.3d 1036 (2002), the Court of Appeals held that the city of Seattle’s (City) practice of certifying five police officers with the highest civil service exam scores for promotional opportunities substantially accomplishes the purpose of chapter 41.12 RCW to provide for promotions on the basis of merit. Dennis P. Ramm, Tim D. Greeley, and Keith Swank seek reversal, arguing that the City’s practice of certifying five police officers for promotional opportunities gives the chief of police (Chief) too much discretion…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Ellis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. City of Yakima v. International Ass'n of Fire FightersWashington Supreme Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kelly v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Wallace v. Lewis CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Wallace v. Lewis CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API