Legal Opinion

Burttram v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 4, 2003No. 2D02-3503PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Thomas Burttram appeals the judgment and sentence that were entered after this court remanded his case to the trial court. See Burttram v. State, 780 So.2d 224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Counsel filed briefs asserting no meritorious argument pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We agree with counsel that no meritorious issues exist, and we therefore affirm. We write only to correct a scrivener’s error. Second-degree murder is a first-degree felony punishable by life, not a second-degree felony as indicated on the judgment. See § 782.04(2), Fla. Stat.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Burttram v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Balmori v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. ANDRES RODRIGUEZ TORRES v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. BRUCE A. FORNEY v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  4. DAVID L. WILSON v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  5. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API