Legal Opinion

Hagerty v. Crowley

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 7, 1909PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Petition, for writs of certiorari and quo warranto. Trial by the court. Facts found, and cases transferred from the May term, 1909, of the superior court, by Chamberlin, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBingham, J.

The first proceeding is a petition for a writ of certiorari, directing the mayor and aldermen of the city of Nashua to certify the records of their proceedings in removing Hagerty from membership in the board of public works of the city, and asking that their order removing him from office be decreed null and void. The second is a petition for a writ of quo warranto to oust the defendant Crowley from membership in the board of public works, he having been appointed by the mayor and aldermen of the city to fill the vacancy caused by the removal of Hagerty, and having qualified and entered upon…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hart v. Common CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Dullam v. WillsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Biggs v. McBrideOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  4. State ex rel. Denison v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  5. McCully v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Nagle v. SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. People v. ShawyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  3. State Ex Rel. Holt v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Farish v. YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State Ex Rel. Gallagher v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API