Legal Opinion

Courtney L. Schwartz v. Jodi S. Heeter

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 2013No. 02S03-1301-DR-18PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSH, Justice.

Irregular income — bonuses, commissions, and the like — can make applying the Child Support Rules and Guidelines challenging. Practitioners and courts have worked to craft suitable solutions, and we certainly encourage parents to negotiate creative agreements that accurately account for irregular income, avoid litigation, and adequately provide for children. Here, in an effort to craft a workable solution, Mother and Father made a seemingly simple agreement: to recalculate their support obligation annually using the Guidelines.

But despite their best-laid plans, their agreement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Dunn v. Meridian Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. John Haegert v. University of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Ethyl Corp. v. Forcum-Lannom Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Michael D. Perkinson, Jr. v. Kay Char PerkinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. Teton Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Consumer Attorney Services, P.A., The McCann Law Group LLP, and Brenda L. McCann, Individually and as Owner and/or Officer of Consumer Attorney Services, P.A. v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Paternity of G.G.B.W. v. S.W.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. William J. Knapp and Rosalea M. Knapp v. The Estate of Carl R. Wright and Joan M. WrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Mark Rolley v. Melissa RolleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API