Cockerline v. Anderson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.
For some time prior to July 18, 1933, plaintiff was employed by defendants as a farm hand. On that day, while in pursuit of his duties as such, he sustained injuries. He brought this action, alleging that his injuries were the proximate result of negligence on the part of defendants. The cause was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict for plaintiff. From judgment on the verdict, defendants appeal.
The only error assigned is predicated on denial of appellants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Since this assignment raises only the question of the sufficiency of the evidence…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- St. Germain v. Potlatch Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Mattson v. Eureka Cedar Lumber & Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Whitehouse v. Bryant Lumber & Shingle Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
- Dumas v. Walville Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- McGinn v. North Coast Stevedoring Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thomas v. Inland Motor FreightWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Allen v. Washington National InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1941