Legal Opinion

In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of Hecht

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1927PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtProskauer, J.

These appeals concern the constitutionality and interpretation of the amendments to section 230 of the Tax Law made by chapter 144 of the Laws of 1925. Prior to the enactment of that statute, under this section a contingent remainder was assessed for taxation at the highest rate possible on the happening of any contingencies and the tax was presently levied. By section 241 it had been provided that the State should retain and hold to the credit of the estate so much of the tax assessed upon such contingent remainders as represented the difference between the tax at the highest rate and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of SeligmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of SeligmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Salomon v. State Tax Comm'n of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. In re the Estate of HosfordNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
  3. In re the Estate of SonnenburgNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928
  4. In re the Estate of BarclayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  5. Piller v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API