Legal Opinion

Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance v. Hendrick

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1946No. Docket No. 53, Calendar No. 43,510PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, C. J.

Plaintiff insurance company filed a bill of interpleader for a judicial determination as to whom it should pay the balance of the amount due on a policy for $1,000, issued on the life of Cecil Leo Holcomb, the decedent. Jesse D. Holcomb, administrator of decedent’s estate, Earl Louis McDougal,-administrator of the estate of Darlene Holcomb, deceased, and Hazel Hendrick (formerly Hazel Holcomb), all claimants, were named as defendants. The insurance company paid into court the sum of $866, the balance due on the policy after the deduction of the amount due on certain loans made to the insured.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. New York Life Insurance Co. v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Hooton v. HootonMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cooley v. CooleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Lynch v. BogenriefSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  3. Murray v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1950
  4. Binben v. Continental Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. McCoy v. McCoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API