Legal Opinion

Katz 737 Corp. v. Shapiro

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided November 13, 1980PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ira Gammerman, J.

In this summary proceeding, petitioner and respondent hotly contest the issue of paramount rights to a closet. Both *128have moved for summary judgment.

Petitioner commenced the proceeding pursuant to RPAPL 713 (subd 7) to terminate respondent’s alleged license to use a large closet in the service hallway of petitioner’s premises, adjacent to respondent’s penthouse apartment. Conspicuous service was affected by affixing a copy of the petition and notice of petition to the closet door and mailing a copy to respondent’s residential address. The court finds this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crosdale v. . LaniganNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Greenwood Lake & Port Jervis Railroad v. New York & Greenwood Lake RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Pierrepont v. . BarnardNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  4. Lemkin v. GuldeNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Olin v. KingsburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Karlin v. BridgesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Sheinberg v. 177 E. 77, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API