Katz 737 Corp. v. Shapiro
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ira Gammerman, J.
In this summary proceeding, petitioner and respondent hotly contest the issue of paramount rights to a closet. Both *128have moved for summary judgment.
Petitioner commenced the proceeding pursuant to RPAPL 713 (subd 7) to terminate respondent’s alleged license to use a large closet in the service hallway of petitioner’s premises, adjacent to respondent’s penthouse apartment. Conspicuous service was affected by affixing a copy of the petition and notice of petition to the closet door and mailing a copy to respondent’s residential address. The court finds this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crosdale v. . LaniganNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Greenwood Lake & Port Jervis Railroad v. New York & Greenwood Lake RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Pierrepont v. . BarnardNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Lemkin v. GuldeNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Olin v. KingsburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
3Cited by2 opinions
- Karlin v. BridgesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Sheinberg v. 177 E. 77, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998