Legal Opinion
Wade v. Ford Motor Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 3, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
This action in tort for deceit is brought severally by three plaintiffs, seeking damages from each of three defendants, severally. The defendant Ford Motor Company (hereinafter called Ford) demurred on the grounds that the plaintiffs’ declaration, as amended, (1) failed to state a cause of action and (2) improperly joined the plaintiffs and the defendants in one action. An order was entered sustaining the demurrer, from which the plaintiffs appealed. G. L. c. 231, § 96.
The declaration 1 alleged that for a long time prior to March, 1958, Rowe Motor Company, Inc. (Rowe), was an authorized Ford…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Swinton v. Whitinsville Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Kilroy v. BarronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Windram v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Hocker v. GentryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1861
- Stewart v. JoyceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kannavos v. AnninoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Duane v. City of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
- Altenhaus v. LouisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Warren Bros. Co. v. TraviMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1974
- Barry v. Treasurer of Essex CountyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.