Legal Opinion

Duane v. City of Quincy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 4, 1966PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKirk, J.

Under Gr. L. e. 231A the petitioners, hundreds in number, and all residents and taxpayers of the city of Quincy (the city), seek a determination of the constitutionality of St. 1964, c. 666, 1 which authorized and empowered the city to construct a refuse disposal incinerator on designated land owned by it, ‘ ‘ [n] otwithstanding any zoning ordinance, or any general or special law to the contrary . . ..” The petitioners allege an interest in the subject matter because “they own land on or near Quarry Street.” They seek to enjoin the city permanently from building the incinerator.

The suit was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cole v. Chief of PoliceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Cole v. VioletteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. North v. City Council of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  4. Wade v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  5. Bob Ware's Food Shops, Inc. v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Konstantopoulos v. Town of WhatelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Ciszewski v. Industrial Accident BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Bello v. South Shore HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Bunker Hill Distributing, Inc. v. District AttorneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Trustees of Tufts College v. Volpe Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API