Thornton v. Doyle
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRANDALL, Presiding Judge.
This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus in which petitioner, David Thornton, attacks the lawfulness of his detention arising from two judgments of contempt. Petitioner is ordered discharged.
Petitioner is an attorney licensed to practice law in Missouri. The two criminal contempt judgments arise from petitioner’s representation of two defendants in separate criminal cases.
For criminal contempt, both the judgment of contempt and order of commitment must recite the relevant facts and circumstances constituting the offense and not simply the legal conclusions of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Chassaing v. MummertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Osborne v. PurdomeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Tannenbaum v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. WardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- McMullin v. SulgroveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re BauerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Lomax v. MerrittMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005