Legal Opinion

In Re Bauer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 4, 2001No. 99SA137PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

These are two consolidated contempt proceedings that were initiated by the Office of Regulation Counsel, which charged the respondent, Richard Burton Bauer, with continuing to practice law in violation of our order immediately suspending him. We issued a contempt citation ordering Bauer to show cause why he should not be held in contempt. After considering his response, we appointed the presiding disciplinary judge (PDJ) as a special master to make findings whether Bauer was in contempt of our suspension order and, if so, to recommend an appropriate sanction. The PDJ conducted proceedings and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. StephensonColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. IN RE the Parental Responsibilities Concerning A.C.B., a Child, and Concerning Laura Jeane Frederick, and Joshua Broyhill, and Concerning Pueblo County Child Support Services, Intervenor-Appellee.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. People v. BauerColorado Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API