Legal Opinion

In re Effinger

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 9, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Charles H. Effinger and another, copartners trading as Effinger & Aitlcen. On exceptions of partnership creditors to the allowance of dividends on certain claims preferred by the bankrupt Effinger, on behalf of his individual estate as against the partnership creditors.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, District Judge.

Upon the handing down of the foregoing opinion (184 Fed. 724), an order was entered in conformity therewith. Miss Massie was the only individual creditor of the bankrupt, Effinger, for any considerable sum. She availed herself of the permission given by the order, and intervened. It becomes necessary, therefore, to decide whether either of the two claims mentioned in the opinion heretofore delivered is entitled to participate pro rata with the firm creditors in the distribution of firm assets. The first of these claims is for money advanced to the firm by the partner,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hiscock v. Varick Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. In re WilcoxDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1899
  3. Wallerstein v. ErvinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1901
  4. Euclid Nat. Bank v. Union Trust & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1906
  5. In re CarmichaelDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. William J. Rochelle, Jr., Trustee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Titus v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  3. In re F. J. Hacker & Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API