Wallerstein v. Ervin
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
'Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in Bankruptcy.
1Opinion of the Court
DALLAS, Circuit Judge.
We have no doubt that the agreement of December 15,- 1899, between Ervin, Page & Co., Incorporated, *125of the one part, and Ervin & Fagan, trading as Barnes & Co., of the other part, would, if valid, have created a copartnership, and that it was therefore an agreement which the corporate party thereto was not empowered to make. But this affirmance of the proposition upon which the learned counsel of the appellant has mainly based his contention does not involve the acceptance of his conclusion. The record shows that the corporation of Ervin, Page & Co. did in fact assume…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Catskill Bank v. Horace Gray & the Ulster Iron Co.New York Supreme Court · 1851
- Oil Creek & Allegheny River Railroad v. Pennsylvania Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
- Wright v. Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
- Boyd v. American Carbon Black Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Cleveland Paper Co. v. Courier Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wagner Supply Co. v. BatemanTexas Supreme Court · 1929
- Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. PattenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- In Re Kentucky Wagon Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1932
- In re TelferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Peckett v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.