Legal Opinion

Western Corporation v. Stan L. Vanek

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 2006No. 32523PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

This is an action brought by Western Corporation to revive a judgment that it had obtained against Stan L. Vanek in January 1997. Vanek filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that this action was not brought within the limitation period. The district court denied the motion, and Vanek appeals. The issue presented is the effect of a provision in the 1997 judgment stating that the judgment was entered “nunc pro tunc” to a date ten days preceding the filing of the judgment.

I

BACKGROUND

In 1997, Western Corporation and Vanek entered into a “Stipulation and Judgment” in favor of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StearnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Spence v. HowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Corbridge v. Clark Equipment Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Nerco Minerals Co. v. Morrison Knudsen Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Bashor v. BeloitIdaho Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCormack v. CaldwellIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Andrew Mefford-Stanger v. John StangerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API